Try this: http://www.kiltmen.com/suppliers.htm
This is a list of several dozen suppliers. Take a look. You will be amazed. Better yet, order one (or more)!! You will be glad you did.
Monday, January 8, 2007
Sunday, January 7, 2007
The opression of leg tubes
Thousands, nay, tens of thousands of men, young and old, have discovered the joys of freedom from leg tubes. Leg tubes? Another name for trousers. As of this writing there are several dozen suppliers of unbifurcated (not divided in two) modern kilts and skirts aimed at the male market. I'm not talking about the tartan Scottish kilt, though that venerable garment is also extremely popular. What I am talking about are contemporary kilts and skirts cut for a mans body. Materials are commonly poly cotton blends, polyviscose, denim, rayon, wool, and even leather, in a wide variety of patterns and colors.
Here is a link to a site with dozens of other links, some of which don't seem to work any more:
http://www.zyra.org.uk/sk4men.htm
I have personally worn the Scottish kilt for more than 50 years, and the contemporary variety for the last seven or so. I have come to the point that I greatly detest trousers as hot, binding, chafing instruments of male torture ill suited to the male anatomy. Further, I have decided, upon much reflection, that there is no supportable reason why man should not have the exact same freedom of clothing choices as do women. To insist otherwise is nothing more than discrimination based on sex which is not only illogical, but illegal (with a very few exceptions).
Here is a link to a site with dozens of other links, some of which don't seem to work any more:
http://www.zyra.org.uk/sk4men.htm
I have personally worn the Scottish kilt for more than 50 years, and the contemporary variety for the last seven or so. I have come to the point that I greatly detest trousers as hot, binding, chafing instruments of male torture ill suited to the male anatomy. Further, I have decided, upon much reflection, that there is no supportable reason why man should not have the exact same freedom of clothing choices as do women. To insist otherwise is nothing more than discrimination based on sex which is not only illogical, but illegal (with a very few exceptions).
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)